They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. If it were to cost any more, they wouldn't use it." "For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. At the moment, the user is open to using MagicDraw if it's 15% more than other solutions.
#NO MAGIC MAGICDRAW MAC#
"When I am working with my Mac and I right-click to copy and paste, it doesn't work." "The UI UX of the tool is not really user-friendly and needs to be completely reformed." "The documentation for MagicDraw and the video tutorials compared to other competitors is an area for improvement." "The licenses are expensive compared to similar tools. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet." "The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform." Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it." "If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good.
It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use.
NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java." "The migration strategy needs to be improved." "Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process.
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved." "The initial setup can be complex for business users." "In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition." "I'm from the. It enables you to generate significant savings by modeling that new product or that system before you ever start developing a prototype." It takes away the mounds of paper and puts it into a model. That's the systems engineering required to either produce an IP system or product. However, it was initially designed and developed for model-based systems engineering. You can use it for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise. You can use it for business architecture design. It's a level better." "The most valuable feature is the amount of flexibility that one has to model, which is great for an individual." "The technical support is very good." "I think one of the key things is the plugins for integration with requirements management tools like Doors" "The MBFC capability of MagicDraw is higher than the other competitors." "When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool. Enterprise Architect has a lot of bugs and MagicDraw is a lot more accurate and flexible.
#NO MAGIC MAGICDRAW CODE#
The simulation allows you to bring in code off of an external code that you can write to set up the simulation and execute the code." "I would rate MagicDraw a nine out of ten because of the price. "The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface." "The beauty of MagicDraw is that it has a simulation part, so you can simulate your model to validate it.
0 kommentar(er)
